Category: Hot Cases

Electronic System Operator (PSE)

Recently, much news has appeared in the media regarding the Electronic System Operator (PSE) regulations that threaten several large companies such as Google, Facebook, Instagram, and others. The Ministry of Communication and Information (Kemenkominfo) threatened to block all companies that have not registered for the Private Scope Electronic System Operator (PSE) launched by Kominfo.

Before we discuss further PSE, it’s good that we first know what PSE is. According to the official website of the Ministry of Communication and Information, Electronic System Operator (PSE) is every person, state administrator, business entity, and community that provides manages, and/or operates an electronic system individually or jointly to users of electronic systems for their own needs and/or needs of other parties.

Then who should register the PSE? According to the Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Information Number 5 of 2020, those who are obliged to register PSE are Portals, sites, or applications on the network via the internet that are used to:

  1. Provide, manage, and/or operate the offer and/or trade of goods and/or services;
  2. Provide, manage, and/or operate financial transaction services;
  3. Delivery of paid digital materials or content through the data network either by way of downloading through portals or websites, send by electronic mail, or through other applications to the user’s device;
  4. Provide, manage, and/or operate communication services including but not limited to short messages, voice calls, video calls, electronic mail, and online conversations in the form of digital platforms, network services, and social media;
  5. Search engine services, Electronic Information provision services in the form of writing, sound, images, animations, music, videos, films, and games or a combination of some and/or all of them; and/or
  6. Personal data processing for operational activities to serve the public related to Electronic Transaction activities.

The obligation to register the Private Scope PSE must be carried out before the Electronic System begins to be used by Electronic System Users.

Queen Law Firm Handles International Drug Case

Queen Law Firm is currently assisting the International Network Drug case with 30 Kg of Methamphetamine evidence with a network of interstate dealers who have the role of importing drugs into Indonesia by land.


The shipment of methamphetamine from Myanmar to Kuching (Malaysia), then to Pontianak to Pangkalan Bun and to the Port of Tanjung Perak, Surabaya.


The suspect we accompanied Lhau Chu Hee was a drug courier in charge of sending goods from Malaysia to Indonesia and not an international drug dealer, so we will defend the rights of the suspect and help the authorities to uncover who is the big dealer behind the case.


Meanwhile, one of the suspects, Che Kim Tiong, claimed to send methamphetamine on the orders of Mr. Po from Kuching, Malaysia. From Mr. Po, Che Kim Tiong claimed to get as much as 40 thousand ringgit or around Rp. 133 million, while Lhau Chu Hee served as a methamphetamine courier who got paid 7,000 ringgit or around Rp. 23 million.

Arrest of Wisnu Wardhana in the Corruption Case

We as citizens greatly appreciated the performance of the Surabaya training team which had arrested Wisnu Wardana who was a fugitive from the Corruption case, who was arrested on Wednesday 9 January 2019, previously Wisnu Wardana was on the run for three months. With the arrests that took place very dramatically so that the motorbike of the Surabaya team was hit by Wisnu Wasdana to smoky. After being arrested, the convict was then taken to the Surabaya District Prosecutor’s Office to undergo several document checks before being taken to Surabaya Class I Lapas in Porong Sidoarjo.

Wisnu Wardana is a convicted corruption case that has cost the country Rp 11.7 billion. Wisnu Wardana was proven to violate Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crime as amended in Law Number 20 Year 2001 concerning Amendment to Law Number 31 Year 1999 in conjunction with Article 55 paragraph (1) of the First Criminal Code.

The case of Wisnu Wardana Alone was sentenced to 3 years in prison and a fine of Rp 200 million subsidiary 2 months in prison at the Surabaya Corruption Court. Then Wisnu Wardhana appealed to the East Java High Court which reduced his sentence to 1 year in prison. After that, the East Java Attorney appealed to the Supreme Court which later in December 2018 raised the Wisnu Wardhana verdict to 6 years in prison and a fine of Rp. 200 million subsidiary six months in prison, and obliged Wisnu Wardhana to pay a compensation of Rp1,566,150,733 three years in prison.